AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package is suspicious due to low maintainer effort and incomplete author information, despite showing no signs of obfuscation or credential theft.
- Low maintainer effort indicated by metadata
- Incomplete author profile
Per-check LLM notes
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious credential theft.
- Metadata: The package shows signs of low maintainer effort and an incomplete author profile, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 3.0
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Use this prompt to build a project with 227checkergenerator
Build a simple Python application using the 227checkergenerator package to demonstrate its core features.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue