AI Analysis
Final verdict: SAFE
The package exhibits very low risks across network, shell, obfuscation, and credential fronts, with only metadata indicating minor concerns about the author's reliability.
- Low risk scores across multiple categories.
- Minor concerns regarding author's metadata.
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal for Django as it does not inherently require external communications.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, which aligns with Django's typical usage and functionality.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The author's information is incomplete and the maintainer has few packages, suggesting potential unreliability.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: djangoproject.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
Repository django/django appears legitimate
Maintainer History
score 4.0
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Use this prompt to build a project with Django
Build a simple Python application using the Django package to demonstrate its core features.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue