AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package appears generally benign but raises concerns due to the metadata risk associated with the repository and maintainer's history, suggesting potential suspicious activity.
- metadata risk of 7/10
- potentially throwaway account
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package's functionality requires external API interactions.
- Shell: No shell execution detected, which is typical and does not indicate any suspicious activity.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The repository and maintainer history suggest a potentially throwaway account with suspicious activity patterns.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 7.5
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T05:32:17Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T05:32:17Z)Single contributor with only 3 commit(s) — possibly throwaway accountAll 3 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T07:28:49.000Z)Author "fmasterpro27" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue