AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package has a moderate risk score due to incomplete metadata and potential shell injection risks, although no direct evidence of malicious activity or network exposure was found.
- Incomplete author information
- Potential shell execution risk
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal for a logging package.
- Shell: The shell execution pattern observed suggests the package might use a pager command for displaying logs, which could be intended for user convenience but should be reviewed to ensure it does not introduce security risks.
- Metadata: The author information is incomplete, which raises some suspicion but does not strongly indicate malicious intent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
score 2.0
Found 1 shell execution pattern(s)
self._pager_process = subprocess.Popen( [pager_cmd], stdin=self._pipe_read,
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: rackslab.io>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
Repository rackslab/RFL appears legitimate
Maintainer History
score 4.0
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Use this prompt to build a project with RFL.log
Build a simple Python application using the RFL.log package to demonstrate its core features.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue