AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risk in terms of network calls, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, the metadata risk score is high due to the package's recent creation and the maintainer's lack of history on PyPI.
- High metadata risk due to new maintainer
- Recent package creation
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The detected network call patterns suggest the package is making HTTP requests, which could be normal if it's designed to communicate with an external service.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating low risk for direct system command execution.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is suspicious due to its recent creation and the maintainer's lack of history with PyPI.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 3.0
Found 2 network call pattern(s)
t} response = requests.post( self._endpoint, jsot} response = requests.get( self._endpoint, par
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 3.0
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T06:12:36.000Z)Author "Your Name" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue