attestd

v0.2.1 suspicious
4.0
Medium Risk

Python SDK for the Attestd security risk API

🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package has moderate risk due to potential author inactivity and lack of repository visibility, despite showing no direct malicious activities.

  • Metadata risk score of 5 out of 10
  • No significant security risks identified in other categories
Per-check LLM notes
  • Network: The presence of network calls is expected if the package relies on HTTP requests to external services.
  • Shell: No shell execution patterns were detected, indicating no immediate risk from this aspect.
  • Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent.
  • Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting no attempt to steal secrets.
  • Metadata: The package shows signs of potential author inactivity and lack of repository visibility, raising some suspicion.

📦 Package Quality Overall: Medium (5.6/10)

✦ High Test Suite 9.0

Test suite present — 3 test file(s) found

  • Test runner config found: conftest.py
  • Test runner config found: pyproject.toml
  • 3 test file(s) detected (e.g. conftest.py)
◈ Medium Documentation 7.0

Some documentation present

  • Documentation URL: "Docs" -> https://attestd.io/docs
  • Detailed PyPI description (9063 chars)
○ Low Contributing Guide 4.0

No contributing guide or governance files found

  • Development Status classifier >= Beta
◈ Medium Type Annotations 7.0

Partial type annotation coverage

  • Classifier: Typing :: Typed
  • 24 type-annotated function signatures detected in source
○ Low Multiple Contributors 1.0

Could not retrieve contributor data from GitHub

  • GitHub API error: 404

🔬 Heuristic Checks

⚠ Outbound Network Calls score 3.0

Found 2 network call pattern(s)

  • _retries self._http = httpx.Client( base_url=base_url, headers=make_hea
  • _retries self._http = httpx.AsyncClient( base_url=base_url, headers=make_hea
✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

⚠ Git Repository History score 3.0

Repository not found (deleted or private)

  • Repository not found (deleted or private)
⚠ Maintainer History score 4.0

2 maintainer concern(s) found

  • Author name is missing or very short
  • Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
✓ Known CVE Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.

💡 AI App Starter Prompt

Use this prompt to build a project with attestd 
Create a web-based security risk assessment tool using Python and the Attestd SDK. This tool will allow users to input domain names or IP addresses and receive a detailed report on potential security risks associated with these inputs. The application should have a user-friendly interface where users can enter their queries and view results in real-time. Additionally, the tool should store historical data so that users can review past assessments.

Key Features:
- User Input: Users can enter domain names or IP addresses.
- Real-Time Assessment: The application should provide immediate feedback based on the Attestd API calls.
- Detailed Reports: Display comprehensive reports including risk scores, detected vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies.
- Historical Data Storage: Store previous assessments for each user account.
- User Accounts: Allow users to create accounts to save and manage their assessments.
- Secure Authentication: Implement secure login mechanisms to protect user data.

How to Utilize 'attestd':
- Use the 'attestd' package to make API requests for security risk assessments of the provided domain names or IP addresses.
- Integrate the package's functionality into your backend to process and analyze the returned data.
- Ensure all data handling respects privacy and security best practices.

💬 Discussion Feed

Leave a comment

No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!