🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package has minimal risks associated with network, shell, and obfuscation activities but raises concerns due to its lack of maintainer history and essential metadata.

Metadata risk is high due to the absence of essential metadata like author information.
The package is newly released with no prior maintainer history.

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls detected, which is normal for a library focused on local authentication actions.
Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, aligning with expectations for a pure Python SDK.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Metadata: The package is brand new with no maintainer history and lacks essential metadata such as an author name, raising suspicion.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

✓ Git Repository History

No GitHub repository linked

No GitHub repository link found

⚠ Maintainer History score 10.0

5 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T22:13:45.000Z)
Author name is missing or very short
Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)