🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package exhibits low risks in terms of network, shell, obfuscation, and credential handling, but its minimal metadata and lack of an associated repository raise concerns about its legitimacy.

Minimal metadata and no associated GitHub repository
Recently uploaded

Per-check LLM notes

Network: The network calls appear to be related to authentication and requesting links, which are typical for SDKs requiring user interaction or service access.
Shell: No shell execution patterns detected.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Metadata: The package is newly uploaded with minimal metadata and no associated GitHub repository, raising suspicion.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

⚠ Outbound Network Calls score 3.0

Found 2 network call pattern(s)

ct[str, Any]: resp = requests.post(f"{self.base_url}/api/auth/login", json=payload, headers=sel
ct[str, Any]: resp = requests.post(f"{self.base_url}/api/auth/request-link", json=payload, head

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

✓ Git Repository History

No GitHub repository linked

No GitHub repository link found

⚠ Maintainer History score 8.0

4 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T00:57:19.000Z)
Author "Concordia" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)