AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package exhibits low risks in terms of network, shell, obfuscation, and credential handling, but its minimal metadata and lack of an associated repository raise concerns about its legitimacy.
- Minimal metadata and no associated GitHub repository
- Recently uploaded
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The network calls appear to be related to authentication and requesting links, which are typical for SDKs requiring user interaction or service access.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is newly uploaded with minimal metadata and no associated GitHub repository, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 3.0
Found 2 network call pattern(s)
ct[str, Any]: resp = requests.post(f"{self.base_url}/api/auth/login", json=payload, headers=selct[str, Any]: resp = requests.post(f"{self.base_url}/api/auth/request-link", json=payload, head
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T00:57:19.000Z)Author "Concordia" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue