AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risk in terms of network, shell, and obfuscation activities. However, the metadata risk score is elevated due to recent creation, rapid commit history, and a single version release from a potentially new maintainer account.
- metadata risk due to recent creation
- rapid commit history
- single version release
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package's functionality requires external communication.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The recent creation and rapid commit history suggest potential risk, especially with a single version release and a possibly new maintainer account.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 5.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-04T22:44:27Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-04T22:44:27Z)All 11 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T23:57:28.000Z)Author "Ursina Sanderink" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue