AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network usage, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, the metadata risk score is high due to recent activity and a lack of maintainer history, raising suspicion about potential supply-chain attack vectors.
- High metadata risk score
- Lack of maintainer history
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires network functionality.
- Shell: No shell execution detected, indicating no immediate risk from command injection or similar attacks.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: Highly suspicious due to recent activity and lack of maintainer history.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 5.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T00:59:46Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T00:59:46Z)All 7 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T02:44:24.000Z)Author "George Elkins" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue