🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package shows minimal risk in terms of network activity, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential handling. However, the metadata risk is high due to the lack of maintainer history and immediate release after creation, raising suspicion about its legitimacy.

High metadata risk
Immediate release after creation

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls suggest normal behavior unless the package's intended functionality requires it.
Shell: No shell executions detected, indicating the package does not execute external commands which is typical for benign packages.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Metadata: High risk due to lack of maintainer history and immediate release after creation.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

✓ Git Repository History

No GitHub repository linked

No GitHub repository link found

⚠ Maintainer History score 10.0

5 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T01:04:25.000Z)
Author name is missing or very short
Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)