AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package has minimal risk factors identified but shows red flags in metadata, such as a single release, lack of detailed author information, and no linked repository, raising concerns about its legitimacy.
- Single release version
- Minimal author information
- No linked repository
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell executions detected, indicating no direct system command invocations.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package shows several red flags including a missing repository, a single release, and an author with minimal information.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: vistralis.org>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 3.0
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T22:52:45.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue