AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows signs of potential data exfiltration due to its network activity and lacks community engagement, raising concerns about its legitimacy.
- network risk due to external resource fetching
- low metadata activity raising suspicion
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The network calls suggest the package fetches external resources which may be part of its intended functionality, but could indicate data exfiltration if not properly disclosed.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, suggesting low risk in this area.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is newly created with minimal activity and no community engagement, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 3.0
Found 2 network call pattern(s)
/1.0"} try: req = urllib.request.Request(url, headers=headers) with urllib.request.urheaders=headers) with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=10) as response: html = res
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 2.5
Git history flags: Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T18:10:49.000Z)Author "Harel Asaf" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue