AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package exhibits low risks in terms of network, shell, obfuscation, and credential interactions but has a high metadata risk due to its novelty and lack of maintainer history, which raises concerns about potential malicious intent.
- High metadata risk
- Very new package with low maintainer history
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The network call pattern is expected for an API interaction with Helius services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is very new with low metadata quality and limited maintainer history, raising suspicion of potential malintent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 1.5
Found 1 network call pattern(s)
try: response = requests.post( self.url, json=payload, headers=headers, timeou
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T05:52:06.000Z)Author "rkohl" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue