AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package has minimal immediate execution risks but raises concerns due to its lack of maintainer history and missing author information, suggesting potential malicious intent.
- metadata risk score of 7 out of 10
- missing maintainer history and author name
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external API interactions.
- Shell: No shell executions detected, indicating the package does not execute system commands, reducing potential risks.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is newly uploaded with no maintainer history and lacks an author name, raising concerns about potential malicious intent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T00:36:30.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue