AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network, shell, and obfuscation activities but has a high metadata risk due to recent creation and limited activity, raising concerns about potential malicious intent.
- High metadata risk due to new and less active repository
- No immediate signs of malicious activity in code
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of malicious activity.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious credential theft.
- Metadata: The repository and package show signs of being newly created and having limited activity, which could indicate potential malicious intent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 7.5
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T01:29:30Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T01:29:30Z)Single contributor with only 4 commit(s) — possibly throwaway accountAll 4 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T02:25:20.000Z)Author "asapura" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue