AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package exhibits low risks in terms of network, shell, and obfuscation activities. However, the metadata risk score is high due to incomplete author information and lack of maintainer history, suggesting potential issues with its provenance.
- High metadata risk due to incomplete author information and lack of maintainer history
- Otherwise, low risks in network, shell, and obfuscation activities
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is typical for packages not requiring external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not perform system-level commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is newly created with incomplete author information and lacks maintainer history, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: lists.cncf.io>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
Repository alibaba/loongsuite-python-agent appears legitimate
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T01:53:28.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue