AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risk in terms of network activity, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, the high metadata risk due to the lack of historical data and absence of a related GitHub repository raises suspicion about potential supply-chain risks.
- High metadata risk
- Lack of historical data
- No associated GitHub repository
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require external communications.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute system commands without explicit user interaction.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: High risk due to new package with no history and no associated GitHub repo.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T03:00:40.000Z)Author "Bryce Beman" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue