AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low technical risks but raises concerns due to its metadata, suggesting potential low activity or recent creation which could indicate a supply-chain attack.
- Metadata risk is high
- Recently created with low activity
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of executing system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting safe handling of secrets and credentials.
- Metadata: Highly suspicious due to recent creation, low activity, and minimal metadata effort.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 10.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 5 day(s) ago (2026-05-31T08:39:56Z)
Repository created very recently: 5 day(s) ago (2026-05-31T08:39:56Z)Repository has zero stars and zero forksSingle contributor with only 3 commit(s) — possibly throwaway accountAll 3 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T02:38:20.000Z)Author "Shawn Knight" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue