AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risk in terms of network, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential risks. However, the high metadata risk due to recent upload and lack of detailed author information raises concerns.
- High metadata risk
- Single version uploaded
- Lack of detailed author information
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The network calls to fetch IP addresses seem consistent with the package's likely intended purpose of fetching official IPs.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns were detected.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of secret theft.
- Metadata: High risk due to recent upload, single version, and author details lacking.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 4.5
Found 3 network call pattern(s)
re.com/ips-v4" response = requests.get(url) if response.status_code == 200: ips = []re.com/ips-v6" response = requests.get(url) if response.status_code == 200: ips = []port requests response = requests.get(url) if response.status_code == 200: response_js
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: xethh.me>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
Repository pypa/sampleproject appears legitimate
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T23:02:55.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)