AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low technical risks but raises concerns due to its newness and lack of maintainer history or a GitHub repository.
- Metadata risk score is high due to limited maintainer history and lack of repository.
- No immediate technical red flags such as network, shell, or obfuscation risks.
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require external communications.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is new with limited maintainer history and lacks a GitHub repository, raising concerns about its legitimacy.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T04:31:59.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue