AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential handling. However, its metadata risk score is high due to lack of maintainer history and author details.
- High metadata risk score
- Newly uploaded package with no maintainer history
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected; this could be expected if the package is designed to work offline or if it's meant to be configured with specific endpoints.
- Shell: No shell execution detected; this suggests the package does not execute external commands by default.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, suggesting low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating safe handling of secrets.
- Metadata: The package is newly uploaded with no maintainer history and lacks author details, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T04:32:18.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue