AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network calls, shell execution, and obfuscation, but its metadata raises concerns due to lack of maintainer history and missing author information.
- Metadata risk due to new package with no maintainer history
- Missing author information
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires online functionality.
- Shell: No shell execution detected, indicating no immediate risk of command injection or system compromise.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious activity.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting secure handling of secrets and credentials.
- Metadata: The package is new with no maintainer history and lacks an author name, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T23:27:36.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue