AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package exhibits a low risk profile in terms of network, shell, obfuscation, and credential risks. However, the high metadata risk due to its new creation and lack of a linked git repository raises suspicion.
- High metadata risk due to lack of historical data and linked git repository.
- Low risk in network, shell, obfuscation, and credential aspects.
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The presence of network calls is common for scraping packages but requires scrutiny to ensure no unauthorized data exfiltration.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns were detected, indicating low risk for direct system command injection.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is newly created with no history and lacks a linked git repository, raising concerns about its legitimacy.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 1.5
Found 1 network call pattern(s)
on: Session = http_session or requests.Session() self._timeout_seconds: float = timeout_seconds
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:52:23.000Z)Author "ANDRIANAIVO Patrick" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue