AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in network, shell, obfuscation, and credential areas but raises suspicion due to its new upload status and lack of maintainer history.
- Lacks maintainer history
- No author name provided
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: Network calls are expected for cloud-related packages to interact with remote services, but specific behavior should be reviewed.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, which is normal and indicates lower risk.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious activity.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of secret theft.
- Metadata: The package is newly uploaded with no maintainer history and lacks an author name, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 1.5
Found 1 network call pattern(s)
existing_headers return httpx.AsyncClient(**kwargs) def build_environment_class( *, base_env
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T01:25:24.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue