AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package has low risks in terms of network, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, it has a higher metadata risk due to recent upload and incomplete author information, which raises concerns about potential supply-chain attacks.
- Metadata risk is elevated
- Recent upload with incomplete author information
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external communications.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of malicious activity.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is suspicious due to its recent upload and incomplete author information, indicating potential risk.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: sunbird.ai>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
Repository SunbirdAI/salt appears legitimate
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T05:17:20.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue