AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package has no immediate signs of malicious behavior but shows high metadata risk due to its recent creation, minimal activity, and single contributor.
- High metadata risk
- Recent creation with minimal activity
- Single contributor
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires internet access to function.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute external commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: Highly suspicious due to recent creation, minimal activity, and single contributor.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 10.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-04T18:28:31Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-04T18:28:31Z)Repository appears empty (size = 0)Very few commits: 1 totalSingle contributor with only 1 commit(s) — possibly throwaway account
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T22:17:54.000Z)Author "Denise Case" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue