se-codeowners

v0.1.0 suspicious
4.0
Medium Risk

Generate a GitHub CODEOWNERS file from role-based oversight metadata in .accountability/surfaces.toml.

🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package has no immediate signs of malicious behavior but shows high metadata risk due to its recent creation, minimal activity, and single contributor.

  • High metadata risk
  • Recent creation with minimal activity
  • Single contributor
Per-check LLM notes
  • Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires internet access to function.
  • Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute external commands.
  • Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
  • Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
  • Metadata: Highly suspicious due to recent creation, minimal activity, and single contributor.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

Git Repository History score 10.0

Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-04T18:28:31Z)

  • Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-04T18:28:31Z)
  • Repository appears empty (size = 0)
  • Very few commits: 1 total
  • Single contributor with only 1 commit(s) — possibly throwaway account
Maintainer History score 6.0

3 maintainer concern(s) found

  • Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
  • Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T22:17:54.000Z)
  • Author "Denise Case" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)