AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows potential for network communication, but lacks critical metadata such as maintainer history and author details, which raises concerns about its legitimacy.
- network risk due to external communication
- lack of maintainer history and author details
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The presence of network calls suggests the package may communicate with external services, which could be legitimate but requires further investigation to ensure it's not being used for unauthorized data transfer.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating low risk of direct system command execution from this package.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting safe handling of secrets and credentials.
- Metadata: The package is new with no maintainer history and lacks author details, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 1.5
Found 1 network call pattern(s)
PI_KEY} async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client: try: response = await cli
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T00:54:58.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue