AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows minimal risk in terms of network, shell, and obfuscation activities. However, the lack of maintainer history and absence of a linked git repository increase suspicion, warranting further investigation.
- Metadata risk due to new package without maintainer history
- No linked git repository
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious credential theft.
- Metadata: The package is new with no maintainer history and lacks a linked git repository, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T21:41:23.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue