AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows high metadata risk due to recent and suspicious repository activity and maintainer history, raising concerns about potential supply-chain attack vectors despite low technical risks.
- High metadata risk due to suspicious repository activity and maintainer history
- No direct technical risks identified
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution detected, indicating no direct system command execution risk.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious activity.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious activity.
- Metadata: High risk due to recent and suspicious repository activity and maintainer history.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 10.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T06:53:35Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T06:53:35Z)Repository appears empty (size = 0)Single contributor with only 4 commit(s) — possibly throwaway accountAll 4 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T07:20:45.000Z)Author "skillrl contributors" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue