AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package has low risks in terms of network, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential handling. However, the metadata risk score is high due to signs of low effort and suspicious maintainer behavior, suggesting a need for caution.
- High metadata risk score
- Suspicious maintainer behavior
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external communication for its functionality.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute system commands without user interaction.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: Package shows signs of low effort and suspicious maintainer behavior, raising concerns about potential malicious intent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: users.noreply.github.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T01:09:23.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)