AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows signs of potential code injection due to the use of eval() in the global scope, and its recent creation with limited engagement raises concerns about its legitimacy.
- High obfuscation risk due to eval() usage
- Minimal package engagement and history
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal for a disassembler tool.
- Shell: No shell executions detected, aligning with the expected behavior of a disassembler package.
- Obfuscation: Use of eval() with global scope and custom mappings suggests potential for code injection and obfuscation.
- Credentials: No clear patterns indicative of credential harvesting were found.
- Metadata: The package is new with minimal engagement and a single release, raising some suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
score 4.0
Found 2 obfuscation pattern(s)
t_string += line format = eval(format_string, globals(), MapStr()) if not format: contice('or', '"or"') opcode = eval(opcode_string, globals(), MapStr()) if not opcode: conti
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 2.5
Git history flags: Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T21:28:27.000Z)Author "Alkalem" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue