AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows no immediate signs of malicious intent but raises concerns due to its metadata risk score and lack of maintainer history.
- Metadata risk score is 7 out of 10
- Lack of maintainer history and missing author details
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require internet access.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute external commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, suggesting low risk of malicious activity.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of secret theft.
- Metadata: The package is suspicious due to its recent upload, lack of maintainer history, and missing author details.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T23:38:49.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue