AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package is flagged as suspicious due to its high metadata risk and potential shell execution risks.
- High metadata risk with recent upload, single version, low maintainer activity, and incomplete author details.
- Potential shell execution risk detected, indicating possible command injection or unauthorized code execution.
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires network functionality.
- Shell: Detection of shell execution may indicate potential for command injection or unauthorized code execution, warranting further investigation.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: High risk due to recent upload, single version, low maintainer activity, and incomplete author details.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
score 2.0
Found 1 shell execution pattern(s)
me = name self.proc = subprocess.Popen( [get_binary(name)], stdin=subproces
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 2.5
Git history flags: Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T05:11:03.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue