AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network calls, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, the metadata risk score is high due to the package being newly released and having a maintainer with limited history.
- High metadata risk due to new package and limited maintainer history
- Shell execution requires further review
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, indicating low risk.
- Shell: Shell execution is present but does not indicate immediate malicious intent; however, it requires further review to ensure commands executed are safe and aligned with the package's intended functionality.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is very new and the maintainer has limited history, raising concerns about potential malicious intent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
score 6.0
Found 3 shell execution pattern(s)
= time.monotonic() proc = subprocess.run( cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderrh for .gcda ] proc = subprocess.run( cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderrnic() try: proc = subprocess.run( cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 6.0
3 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-04T23:33:40.000Z)Author "Ericson Joseph" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)